RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of electronic cigarette (E-cigarette) use among adolescents is a major public health concern. This study investigates the prevalence of E-cigarette use among male adolescents in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, and explores associated factors. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to April 2023, involving 476 male students aged 12 to 19. Data were collected through structured questionnaires, covering sociodemographic information, E-cigarette usage patterns, reasons for use, sources of acquisition, awareness of nicotine content, and perceptions of harm. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The study revealed a prevalence of 17.4% E-cigarette use among participants, with 12.6% using E-cigarettes exclusively and 4.8% concurrently with traditional tobacco cigarettes. Key findings included initiation as early as age eight, sustained and frequent use, and motivations including peer influence (61.4%), curiosity (31.3%), and flavored options (26.5%). Online platforms (34.9%) and shopping malls (28.9%) were the primary sources of E-cigarette acquisition. Most participants were aware of the nicotine content (84.3%) and believed E-cigarettes were harmful (86.7%). Importantly, 69.9% expressed intentions to quit, with 44.6% planning to do so within 30 days. Significant associations were found between E-cigarette use, education level, and having friends who smoke. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the prevalence of E-cigarette use among male adolescents in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, and identifies peer influence, curiosity, and appealing flavors as driving factors. Targeted prevention and intervention programs, along with regulatory efforts to restrict access, are urgently needed to address this growing public health issue. Increasing awareness of E-cigarette risks and providing cessation support are vital steps towards mitigating E-cigarette use among Saudi male adolescents.
RESUMEN
Background Vaccine hesitancy poses a substantial challenge to the field of public health. There are various factors that influence the willingness of parents to vaccinate their children. Addressing the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy within the community has the potential to facilitate the development of more effective approaches for global vaccination initiatives. This study aims to assess parents' perspectives regarding the immunization of children aged five to 12 against COVID-19, including their experiences with adverse effects, as well as the factors that influence their hesitancy or acceptance of the vaccine in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Methods A web-based, cross-sectional study utilized an independently administered online questionnaire. The validated questionnaire was distributed to study participants through social networking platforms in order to recruit individuals from various locations in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia, such as Dammam, Al-Hassa, Al-Jubail, Ras Tanura, Dhahran, Al-Khobar, and Al-Qatif. Results The study encompassed a total of 399 participants. The most commonly reported adverse effects among the first and second children were pain at the injection site (1st child: 267 (66.70%), second child: 263 (66.20%)) and fever (1st child: 171 (43.10%), second child: 187 (47.50%)). A significant proportion of the participants, specifically 139 individuals (35%), expressed apprehension regarding immunization. This concern stemmed from various factors, including the fear of experiencing adverse effects, skepticism regarding the vaccine's efficacy, and exposure to potentially harmful information about the vaccine. Ninety-nine participants, accounting for 25% of the sample, indicated their agreement with the safety of COVID-19. Additionally, 104 participants, constituting 26% of the sample, held the belief that receiving vaccination aids in the prevention of severe illnesses caused by COVID-19. Notably, the most prevalent reason for vaccine hesitancy among participants was the fear of experiencing adverse effects. A total of 132 individuals, accounting for 33% of the participants, identified healthcare providers, including physicians and scientists, as reliable and trustworthy sources of vaccine information. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the demographic variables of the participants and their acceptance of the vaccine. Conclusion The study observed an acceptable vaccination rate among children aged five to 12 for the COVID-19 vaccine. Based on the investigation results, the primary apprehension expressed by parents regarding the immunization of their offspring pertained to the potential negative consequences associated with the vaccine. Nonetheless, it was observed that adverse effects were reported in less than fifty percent of vaccinated children. Addressing the concerns pertaining to the COVID-19 vaccination can enhance global participation in the immunization program aimed at mitigating future pandemics.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The effects of the anatomical alignment of distal radial extra-articular fractures on the patient's perceived outcome have been drawing much attention recently, and much controversy exists in the literature. The primary purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the radiological parameters of reduction (radial inclination, radial length, and radial tilt) and the patient's perceived functional outcome, which was quantified using the DASH questionnaire. METHODS: The study included one hundred twenty-four patients with distal radial extra-articular fractures managed by closed reduction and casting. Their radiological (anatomical) outcome was determined by measuring the radial inclination, tilt, and length. Subjective functional outcome was quantified using the DASH score, calculated from the Arabic-translated DASH questionnaire at three months and six months after cast removal. RESULTS: the mean DASH score was 31.56 SD± 9.1 at three months and 29 SD± 3.89 at six months, and the acceptable radiological results for radial tilt, radial inclination, and radial length (according to McDermid's criteria for acceptable reduction) were 77.4%, 88.7% and 74.4%, respectively. There was a significant linear correlation between two radiological parameters (radial tilt and radial length) and the DASH score at three-month follow-up, which was more profound among patients under 70 years old and with diabetes mellitus. At the six-month follow-up, there was no significant relationship between the radiological parameters and the DASH score. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that radiological outcome affects the early patient-perceived outcome, with a more significant effect among patients under 70 and diabetics. Nonetheless, over time, there will be no significant relationship between the quality of reduction and patients' perceived outcomes. And this phenomenon requires further investigation.
